Friday, February 22, 2008

The Great Indian Premier League


Bollywood stars, corporate czars and media moghuls can now boast of being the proud owners of India's talented cricketers, thanks to the auction-packed Indian Premier League.

Icon and marquee players became millionaires in a single day as Shah Rukh Khan, Vijay Mallya, Preity Zinta and Rupert Murdoch vied each other to buy cricketers to add lustre to their respective teams.

But what prompted these big shots to shell out huge sums of money? Is it because of their enthusiasm to make cricket the most popular in a country where people already live, drink and eat the game?

Only the gullible can swallow Vijay Mallya's post-auction rhetoric that his aim is not to mint money but try to improve the standard of the game at the domestic level. Shah Rukh Khan even went to the extent to say that he wanted to give a fillip to the game in India. "I wanted to make it viable profession for youngsters to earn a living," he told the media.

But, is it ground reality?

Everybody knows that current crop of Indian cricketers have bank balances that could put some first generation entrepreneurs to shame. They play international cricket round the year. They earn crores of rupees as appearance fees. They endorse a major chunk of Indian products. Some of them even own business houses.

Advertisement companies make a beeline to sign the Indian players. For, the advertisers know that cricketers can easily sell products in this country. Youngsters are not an exception to this phenomenon. A slew of contracts await even a beginner like Ishant Sharma, who has been the pick of the Indian players in the tour Down Under.

Plenty of avenues are avilable for the Indian cricketers now. They have to play their hearts out. Money and stardom follow them naturally.

So Indian cricketers do not need the mercy of Shah Rukhs and Mallyas to make them rich. They have done quite well for themselves without any corporate or showbiz help.

Changing Times

There was a time when Indian cricketers toiled hard to make ends meet. The members of the Indian team that won historic tour of the West Indies in 1971 got a paltry Rs. 750 per match. When India beat New Zealand in a 1956 Test in four days, the players did not even get the allowance for the fifth day. Krish Srikkant recently revealed that he received about Rs.2 lakh in total for being part of the 1983 World Cup winning team - a feat that remains unparalled in India's cricketing history though Dhoni's daredevils did bring home the T-20 trophy last year.

Unfortunately, not too many advertisers, corporates or entertainment honchos cared about these poor cricketers at that time. Because, cricket was played a motley crowd of elite and the upper class. It was not a game played for the proleteriat.

But times have changed. Cricket became the much sought-after game - of the people, for the people and in recent times also by the people! Cricketers became the hottest commodities on the brand building circuit. The Board of Control for Cricket in India, which presides over the game, became the richest sports body in the country.

Now, industry wants to have its share of the booty too. How could they let the BCCI milk the cash cow without asking for their share?

And so we have business tycoons and celluloid superstars and glam dolls eyeing the moolah that the IPL offers. It offers a great business opportunity for them. They can sell the tickets, get advertisement revenues and even use the players to endorse their products.

After all, everyone's success has many fathers!

Tuesday, February 5, 2008

Sania Mirza Decides to Skip Tournaments in India


Sania Mirza and her advisers have got it terribly wrong if they think that skipping tournaments in India will stop controversy-mongers from raking up issues one after the other.

“Every time I play in India, there’s a problem. I even thought about retirement. So I have decided not to play at Bangalore,” she said, according to media reports.

True, she has been unnecessarily dragged into controversies once she started scaling new heights in the world of tennis. Be it the Muslims clerics’ Fatwa for wearing mini-skirts; be it the hue and cry for supporting pre-marital sex; be it shooting of an advertisement on the premises of Mecca Masjid in Hyderabad; be it the contempt suit for a photograph in which her feet appears to be next to the national flag.

FOOLISH DECISION

But it is foolish to think that shirking matches will give her mental peace. She is actually playing into the hands of those who raked up the controversies. It is a like submission on to their knees. It is like a “Leave Me Alone” plea.

I was wondering what happened to the Sania, who mesmerized the tennis aficionados across the world with her skill and youthful exuberance? What happened to the Indian tennis ace who fought valiantly to dominate most of the top players in the women’s circuit?

Sania should understand the controversies follow the celebrities. Prominence makes news, we were taught in our journalism classes. Sania, who studied journalism, too must be aware of this ‘news worthy’ element. It’s a world-wide phenomenon. Neither Sania nor her advisers (read Mahesh Bhupathi’s Globosport) can stop the rumour mill. It will continue to work all the time. The more you play and win matches, the more controversies follow you.

TWO OPTIONS

So Sania now has two options to tide over the mental trauma. The first one is to treat the controversies with contempt. “You cannot bog me down with these kinds of shit”-type of attitude.

The second way (I think the best one) is to ignore the controversies and concentrate on the task at hand. No body can stop you from achieving what you are destined to do. We, the Indians, want to see you on top of the tennis world. We have seen your killer instincts. We have seen your mental strength. You have it in you. Be courageous. And we are with you.

Sania, you should also bear in mind that athletes all over the word had overcome mental trauma and harassment to excel in their chosen sport.

Martina Navratilova had hogged headlines for her same sex orientation. Her father even said that he would have preferred for her to have been a prostitute. But sheer will power saw Navratilova emerging with flying colours.

No tennis player might have suffered as Monica Seles did. She was stabbed in the back by a spectator in 1993. But she returned to the tour in 1995 and won the Australian Open in 1996.

Sania, you should emulate these versatile players. We wish to see you as the world No. 1 athlete.